Senate tax plan incenses anti-poverty advocates
The Congressional Budget Office report released Sunday finds that the Senate tax overhaul bill harms the poorest Americans even more than originally thought.
The CBO finds that Americans making $30,000 or less would be worse off under the Senate tax plan by 2019. Those earning $40,000 or less would be net losers under the plan by 2021. And by 2027, U.S residents who make $75,000 or lower would be worse off under the plan.
That’s partly because of the provision to eliminate the federal insurance mandate, which the CBO said would lead to as many as 13 million Americans becoming uninsured and losing federal subsidies to help them buy insurance.
The findings have incensed anti-poverty advocates in New York.
“It’s like, ‘Let’s just devastate the poor as much as we possibly can,’ ” said Susan Zimet, director of Hunger Action Network, the lobby group for food pantries and soup kitchens.
Zimet said the tax plan doesn’t really help the middle class, either, even though it’s billed as a middle-class tax cut.
“I don’t think they ever even pretended to say it was going to help the poor,” Zimet said.
She said the tax provisions are in addition to proposed budget cuts that would harm the neediest, as well as the elimination of the Child Health Plus program, which provides health insurance to poor children.
The deduction for charitable giving also would be eliminated under the Senate proposal. Zimet said the state’s food pantries and soup kitchens already can’t keep up with the need. She said even in New York, which has more generous public benefit programs than many other states, there isn’t enough money in the state budget for the pantries and kitchens to keep up with the demand.
“It’s going to get worse and worse,” she said.
Ron Deutsch with the liberal leaning think tank Fiscal Policy Institute also believes that the poor won’t fare well under the federal tax overhaul plan. He said the U.S. needs a tax overhaul that is the exact opposite of the current proposals.
“What we really need is a bottom-up tax package, providing cuts to the people at the lowest end of the socioeconomic ladder,” Deutsch said. “Because they’re going to spend the money that they get.”
He said that would help stimulate the economy and potentially even create new jobs.
Deutsch said wealthier people can afford to hang on to any savings from tax changes, so their gains would not necessarily benefit the entire economy.