Corruption trials in ’18 could spur reform
2018 will be a year of criminal trials for former associates of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, as well as former leaders of the Legislature. Reform groups say they hope the lengthy court proceedings will spur lawmakers to enact some ethics reforms.
Six continuous months of corruption trials kick off on Jan. 22, when Cuomo’s former top aide Joe Percoco faces bribery charges for allegedly soliciting more than $300,000 from companies doing business with the state.
Blair Horner with the New York Public Interest Research Group said it will be a year unlike any other.
“Every month, from January through June, we expect there to be a high-profile case commencing,” Horner said.
In February, former state Sen. George Maziarz goes on trial. In March, it’s the former Nassau County executive. In April and June, former legislative leaders Sheldon Silver and Dean Skelos face retrial on corruption charges. And in May, the former head of SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Alain Kaloyeros, will be tried for allegedly conducting kickback and bid-rigging schemes related to economic development contracts between SUNY Poly and state contractors.
Horner said all those accused are innocent until proven guilty, and all could be exonerated. But he said if past corruption trials are any indication, there will be plenty of unsavory testimony about the inner workings of government.
“It will paint a negative picture of politics in New York in terms of the revelations that will come out in these cases,” Horner said.
He compared it to the so-called “Bridgegate” trial in New Jersey.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was not charged with any wrongdoing in connection with a scheme by his administration to close lanes on the George Washington Bridge in order to punish a local mayor. But Christie’s popularity declined after the trial, and he did not seek re-election.
Cuomo also has not been implicated in any of the crimes that his former top aide and former associates are accused of committing.
Alex Camarda with the reform group Reinvent Albany said there’s already been some response from lawmakers.
He said he’s heartened by statements from Senate Republican Majority Leader John Flanagan, who said he wants to closely re-examine all economic development contracts.
“We’ve been very encouraged by Senator Flanagan’s comments,” Camarda said. “And we certainly are going to push our solutions as part of that process.”
Camarda’s group wants to reinstate the state comptroller’s oversight authority over state contracts. That power was removed by the governor and the Legislature several years ago. They’d also like to create a public database of all deals struck between the state and private contractors.
Cuomo proposed several reforms in the 370-page booklet that accompanied his State of the State speech. They include adoption of early voting in New York, same-day voter registration, public financing of campaigns, and constitutional amendments to impose term limits on elected officials.
He also backs a constitutional amendment to limit outside income for legislators and change the Legislature from part time to full time.
“Let legislators say, ‘I work for the public.’ Period. And there are no conflicts presented,” the governor said.
The proposal drew little enthusiasm from senators and Assembly members at the speech, and many did not applaud.
Jennifer Wilson with the League of Women Voters said while she’s pleased with the recommendations, she’s disappointed that Cuomo did not spend more time actually outlining the proposals in his speech. The governor talked about reform for about 1½ minutes out of a 90-minute address.
“I was tweeting during the voter part and the campaign finance part,” said Wilson, who added she regards herself as a fast typist. “But the time I finished tweeting, he was done talking about it. He was on to the next subject.”
Other reform proposals from the governor are similar to ones he introduced last year, which were rejected by the Legislature. They include giving his own inspector general more power to investigate accusations of corruption and fraud within the SUNY system.
The governor also would create a new chief procurement officer to better scrutinize all state contracts with businesses to make sure no corruption is occurring.
Horner, with NYPIRG, said reintroducing the measures may not be such a bad thing.
“Like a fine wine, some of these proposals need aging,” said Horner, who described himself as an eternal optimist.
“And that this year is the year when we pop the cork,” he said.
Horner and the others say they would prefer, though, to have independent oversight of state contracts, not a body that’s controlled by the Legislature or anyone else in government.